All right. Try this,
Then. Every body
I was given Northern Pike by James Wright as part of
a collection of poems about what it means to be happy. So when I read, “All right. Try this, then”, I thought, "Oooh, one more sweet
little happiness sampling! Don’t mind if
I do! Maybe this one will suit me
perfectly."
Then. Every body
I
know and care for,
And
every body
Else
is going
To
die in a loneliness
I
can’t imagine and a pain
I
don’t know. We had
That had to be the most
depressing introduction to a happiness poem—or to any poem—that I had ever
read. I stopped to look at “every
body”. Instead of your average
“everybody” the opposite of “nobody”, I could imagine something more
concrete. Living, breathing bodies that I
could see and hear and touch. People who
may share nothing in common beyond the simple fact of mortality. And then I was amazed at how much meaning
could be packed into that single stroke of a spacebar.
I don’t know. We had
To
go on living. We
The speaker switched to past tense here: “had” instead of “have”. And it sounded very predetermined to me. I thought we must be dealing with some
higher laws here and not just the last-minute problem-solving antics of man.
To go on living. We
Untangled
the net, we slit
The
body of this fish
Open
from the hinge of the tail
To
a place beneath the chin
I
wish I could sing of.
That was a very vivid
description of killing a fish. I
remembered the time I prepared a pig.
The pig had been cooked whole in an underground pit so that the body and
skin were intact even after the meat underneath was brown. I remembered feeling a bit like the
speaker—alternatively gloomy and awestruck—as I pulled the head off with my
hands.
Because if you add the fish
killing description to “We had to go on living”, you get an interesting
idea. Life and death might not be as
stark of opposites as we as we are accustomed to thinking. They refuse to remain separate. Each pole requires the other to exist. We who find ourselves alive cannot really
isolate ourselves from the experience of death.
And the speaker suggests that the dead also need at least some among us
to go on living.
I
would just as soon we let
The
living go on living.
An
old poet whom we believe in
Said
the same thing, and so
The speaker seems unhappy
with the arrangement. He doesn’t like to
be confronted with both life and
death, and wishes they would stay in their separate corners. (I wondered if the “old poet” to whom he refers
is Christ who said, “Let the dead buy their dead” in Luke 9:60.) My question was: Now how are we going to get
from our terrifying life-death mixture to the happiness I was promised at the
beginning?
Said the same thing, and so
We
paused among the dark cattails and prayed
For
the muskrats,
For
the ripples below their tails,
For
the little movements that we knew the crawdads were making under water
For
the right-hand wrist of my cousin who is a policeman.
We
prayed for the game warden’s blindness.
We
prayed for the road home.
We
ate the fish.
There
must be something very beautiful in my body,
I
am so happy.
Answer: with a prayer. I loved that. I had to wonder if the very beautiful thing
inside the speaker’s body was not just a northern pike. Maybe it was his spirit. I remembered something that my uncle wrote to
me: “In
our quietest most deeply reflective moments, when we've quieted the world, and
are not taking counsel from fears—and for some this doesn't occur until nearing
death, but for most we can be still and there most of us find a quiet voice
that says we will be resurrected and live eternally.”
I
liked the things for which the speaker prays, too: Ripples made by both seen (muskrats) and
unseen (crawdads) forces; a policeman’s right-hand wrist whose function is to
draw a gun—to both take and protect life; the game warden whose job is to
oversee the balance between life and death; and the road home, our refuge,
where we can simply live.
So
yes, this “Northern Pike” bit deserves a place among the best happiness poems.
I like that at the end of the poem the author prays for things that perhaps we might not normally think of. Just reminds us to always be thankful.
ReplyDeleteWow! That was a great poem and I loved your comments. I really liked what your uncle said too. Very nice post, thank you!
ReplyDeleteOkay, this was really very interesting to me. I don't know that I would have gotten all of this out of the poem so it was really interesting to read your analysis. I agree with you and Clarissa that the poem ends well, particularly compared to the strangeness of the beginning.
ReplyDeleteWhat an interesting poem! Very simple but happiness is simple! I like how the last line seems to randomly express happiness. Happiness sometimes, at least for me, comes out of random experiences.
ReplyDelete